I was having a discussion with a friend today who, although very liberal of all issues, is somewhat middle of the trail as it pertains to gun control. He is not against concealed carry, but does favor far more background checks – especially on sales from an exclusive individual to private individual.
He is a little surprised that I’m against this. “Why?”, he asked.
First, allow me to preface my reasoning with a little information about me. I’m no anarchist. I’m not really a doomsday prepper. I don’t believe we’re due for a revolution, certainly not within my lifetime. I love having SOME government (don’t tell my anti-statist friends though). Many of these beliefs being so, I must admit that I do fear for the generations that come after my death (I do hope to have at least another 40 years, which will get me into my 80s).
So back to my friend. Why do I disagree with him? Well, it is simple. Background checks on every sale, specifically private individual to private individual, would result in a nationwide gun registry. I’m greatly against having among these.
My friend countered, very proudly I might add, that we must register our cars. Why don’t you our guns? This is simple. Nowhere in the constitution does it guarantee the right to help keep and own cars. All of us caved on the licensing of cars and drivers of a 100 years ago.
Our founding fathers specifically put verbiage in the constitution allowing us to help keep and bear arms. There are different interpretations about what they meant, but I believe at least part of their reasoning was so that we could protect ourselves from the tyrannical government or people who wish to complete us harm.
Do I believe which our government is tyrannical? Well, not exactly yet. Staccato Firearms We are still the most free nation on earth. I do nothing like to path our country is on, but I don’t feel it is to late to right the ship.
Having a national gun registry would result in forced gun buy-backs or even confiscation during some future crisis (either natural or man-made). Having our abilities to protect ourselves from criminals and/or government listed in a database will be sharing information that is way too personal.
The trail to hell is paved with good intentions. Government is proficient at making us feel that being safer (their definition) is really worth giving up a couple of rights. Forcing people everywhere to register their private, constitutionally protected guns is a bad idea.
I will foresee that guns would even get associated with addresses where their owners no longer live. Imagine if you moved right into a home where the last occupants had numerous guns registered and the police came trying to find those folks? All of us understand that police, many of them being great people, do make mistakes when their adrenaline levels are too high. Would you want your home getting shot up because the last residents had guns listed in the registry?
Throughout a so-called “state of emergency” you can bet some local, state or national governments will make a go on to take any weapons that didn’t reside in the hands of government personnel. It has happened. See the video below.
I believe that it is none of the government’s business if I own a weapon (or guns). Yes, I need to do exactly the same background check as someone else when I purchase a new gun. But do you think that having a national registry would keep guns out of the hands of men and women who couldn’t pass a background check? Not really a chance. I believe you would see plenty of gun owners reporting their guns stolen to be able to sell their guns to whomever they desire – just like they can now.
When times get bad, whose doors are agents of the us government (police or military ) planning to be knocking down when they’re going on their gun collection binges? I’ll inform you – the door’s which can be on the addresses contained in the gun registry.
While we don’t currently have a government that kicks in doors and gives gas showers or firing squads to people they cannot like, we don’t know very well what our government will look like in 50 or 100 years. I’d like my children and grandchildren to have the ability to defend themselves from both a tyrannical government or perhaps a homicidal maniac (I suppose they are often one and exactly the same though).
Starting a national gun registry may be the first step to taking guns from people the us government does not need possessing guns. Currently these people are felons and people that have mental problems. Who might these future gunless people be? People of particular political parties? People of certain economic classes? People of certain religions? It has all happened throughout world history. We pretend to function as enlightened Americans but we’ve factions that want to take all our freedoms and give all the ability to the us government exactly like dictators of past and present we’ve all heard of.
So how exactly does this happen? We’ve to consider it from two avenues. First the gradual loss of gun rights for everybody through new “minor” restrictive gun laws. Second, the entire loss of gun rights for specific sets of people the us government has targeted. Imagine a candle burning at both ends. Together end burns, more and more of the governments enemies are specifically forbidden to have guns. As the other end burns, more and more of the overall population are getting the remaining of their gun rights taken away as well. When the flames meet in the centre we’re left without any guns for those who, and we’ve a government with nothing to fear. That’s the nightmare of the slippery slope.